US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 17,641
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00601
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scott v. Kilby ADOC Administrative Staff (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00606
Defendant: Kilby ADOC Administrative Staff
Plaintiff: Prince Sayon Lenard Scott
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Steiger v. United States Probation Office (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00599
Defendant: United States Probation Office
Plaintiff: Bradley Joseph Steiger
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richburg v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00598
Defendant: Cpt. McCee, State of Alabama Department of Corrections, Cpt. Howard and others
Plaintiff: Randy Jerome Richburg
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Saul
as 3:2019cv00600
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Terry McCormick
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bryant v. Richie et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2019cv00596
Defendant: Patrice Richie, Steven Troy Marshall
Plaintiff: Octavius Shuman Bryant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grooms v. Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00597
Plaintiff: Corey Grooms
Defendant: Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC, Christopher Railey
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Smith v. Subway Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00592
Plaintiff: Peter J. Smith
Defendant: Retirement Systems of Alabama, Subway Inc., RSA Security
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Steele v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00595
Plaintiff: Jeremy Antwon Steele
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Tucker et al
as 2:2019mc03893
Defendant: Devon Lyntrell Tucker
Garnishee: Lowe's Home Improvement
Plaintiff: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?