US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,700
Wilson v. Hamm
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff: David P. Wilson
Defendant: John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Headley (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant: Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grady v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: Larry Jerome Grady
Defendant: Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villafana v. Marshall et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff: Peter J. Villafana
Defendant: Steven T. Marshall, Nicki M. McFerrin, Justin Louvorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steward v. Johnson (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff: Randy Steward
Defendant: Cassandra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Santiago Alonso
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Santiago Alonso
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keeton v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant: Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Courtney Morgan
Defendant: Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillon v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: Matthew Dillon
Defendant: Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?