Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 17,967
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01670
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rocket City Showgirls, LLC et al v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board et al
as 2:2024cv01664
Defendant:
Craig Hill, The Madison County, Alabama Commission, Steve Haraway and others
Plaintiff:
Rocket City Showgirls, LLC and The Cheetah Club, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilkins v. City of Albertville
as 5:2024cv01663
Defendant:
City of Albertville
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Perez v. AL Dental PC
as 5:2024cv01665
Defendant:
AL Dental PC
Plaintiff:
Heldegardis Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01669
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lowe v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Phillippi Sultan Lowe
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Steven L. Reed and City of Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thompson v. Foundever
as 2:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Mikisa Thompson
Defendant:
Foundever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMillian v. Teel et al
as 2:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Marcus McMillian
Defendant:
Anita Spivey, Carlton Teel and Christopher J. Gallops
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
