Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 22,501
Lynch v. Givens et al
as 2:2023cv01611
Plaintiff: Ocie Lee Lynch
Defendant: Warden G. Givens, Warden Vencini Smith and Warden Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanback v. Evans et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff: James Stanback
Defendant: Officer Evans and Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keeton et al v. Ogletree et al
as 3:2023cv00685
Plaintiff: Raymond Mitchell Keeton and Brian Henry Ritter
Defendant: Sgt. Ogletree, Jay Jones, Officer Snipes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. State of Alabama
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner: Thomas Norton
Respondent: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilley v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 5:2023cv01593
Plaintiff: Dale William Gilley, Jr
Defendant: Joseph Headley and Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. McClain et al
as 5:2023cv01600
Petitioner: Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent: Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Marshall County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv01599
Plaintiff: Jason M. Allen
Defendant: Marshall County Jail, Warden Addam Riddle, Assistant Warden Bremer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. QCHC
as 5:2023cv01598
Plaintiff: Christopher Carnell Crayton
Defendant: QCHC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila-Gomez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01597
Petitioner: Brenda Avila-Gomez
Respondent: Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Regassa v. Kimberley et al
as 1:2023cv01601
Petitioner: Admassu Regassa
Respondent: M Kimberley, E Johnson, V Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?