US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,814
Wooten v. Shaffer et al
as 4:2024cv00988
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of ALabama and Scotty Shaffer
Petitioner:
David P Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2024cv00987
Defendant:
Convicted Inmates, Staff Employees, State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Jefferson County Clerks Office et al
as 2:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Preston Kennedy Lee
Defendant:
Jacqueline Anderson Smith and Jefferson County Clerks Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Hamm et al
as 4:2024cv00977
Defendant:
Jackson, Barnes, Billingsley and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Ray and Bennu Hannibal Ra-Sun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bullock v. Fountain
as 2:2024cv00966
Defendant:
Kadesha Fountain
Plaintiff:
Gavin L Bullock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Lt. Dent et al
as 4:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Mardedus Mack
Defendant:
Lt. Dent, CO Seales and CO Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Streeter
as 5:2024cv00944
Respondent:
Streeter
Petitioner:
Jerrod Tramell Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Crow et al
as 2:2024cv00943
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and John Crow
Petitioner:
Renard L Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Charles Thompson, Chadwick Crabtree, John Doe Correctional Officer 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosely v. Hamm
as 2:2024cv00942
Defendant:
John Hamm
Plaintiff:
Travis Cintell Mosely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
