US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,739
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presley v. Osborn
as 7:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Bobby Presley
Defendant:
Stefan Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Timothy Price
Defendant:
Hudson, P Homes, Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yauger, Jr. v. Greene County Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Benny Earl Yauger, Jr.
Defendant:
Greene County Jail, Greene County Sheriffs Office, Sheriff Jonathan Benison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcneal v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mcneal
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguayo v. Peters et al
as 7:2024cv00340
Petitioner:
Bertha Aguayo
Defendant:
C Peters and Warden K Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fasold v. Blount County Jail
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Isiah Matthew Fasold
Defendant:
Blount County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olaiya v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00338
Petitioner:
Temitope Olaiya
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
May v. Metro PCS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
Metro PCS, AT&T Corp, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Joshua Russell Sanders
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Charlie, Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
