Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 2,515
Schultz v. Gentry
as 5:2017cv00269
Petitioner: Ray Charles Schultz
Respondent: Matt Gentry
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sterling v. Alabama, State of
as 5:2017cv00268
Petitioner: James Hugo Sterling
Respondent: Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beebe v. Alabama, State of
as 5:2017cv00266
Petitioner: Tyrone Daishawn Beebe
Respondent: Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beebe v. Alabama, State of
as 5:2017cv00267
Petitioner: Davon Treshawn Beebe
Respondent: Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richards v. Gordy et al
as 5:2017cv00253
Petitioner: Timothy J Richards
Respondent: Christopher Gordy, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Archer v. Estes et al
as 5:2017cv00250
Petitioner: Mark David Archer
Respondent: Dewayne Estes, Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Surles v. State of Alabama
as 1:2017cv00206
Petitioner: Christopher Surles
Respondent: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ball v. Bolling et al
as 2:2017cv00207
Petitioner: Paul Wilford Ball
Respondent: Leon Bolling, Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv00175
Petitioner: Tabitha Burks Gray
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cole v. Cardwell et al
as 4:2017cv00149
Petitioner: Aaron Cordero Cole
Respondent: Scott Cardwell, Gary R Cooper, Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?