Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,497
McClain v. State of Alabama
as 2:2025cv00428
Petitioner:
Anthony McClain
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Tuscaloosa County Jail
as 7:2025cv00426
Petitioner:
Joseph Earl Jenkins, Jr
Respondent:
Tuscaloosa County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henderson v. Warden
as 2:2025cv00432
Petitioner:
Edward Lee Henderson, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cesare v. Washington (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00222
Plaintiff:
Dion De Cesare
Defendant:
Warden Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hutchinson v. Washington (INMATE 1)
as 2:2025cv00214
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hutchinson
Defendant:
Warden Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tompkins v. Washington (INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00215
Plaintiff:
George Tompkins
Defendant:
Warden Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Echevarria v. Washington (INMATE 1)
as 2:2025cv00211
Plaintiff:
Josbel Fernadez Echevarria
Defendant:
Milton Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burrell v. Robbins (INMATE 2)
as 3:2025cv00210
Plaintiff:
Reginald D Burrell
Defendant:
Catrina Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. McClain (INMATE 2)
as 3:2025cv00206
Plaintiff:
Bradley Earl Martin
Defendant:
Antonio McClain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Warden
as 1:2025cv00385
Petitioner:
Michael Kenneth Young
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
