Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,295
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Candice Cherie Martin
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mensah v. Warden Kimberly Neely
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Deborah Mensah
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera-Garcia v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Abigal Rivera-Garcia
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henley v. Calloway et al
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Nikita Roland Henley
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Kimberley
as 1:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Isaac Jerome Smith
Respondent:
M. Kimberley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell and A.D.O.C.
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00230
Petitioner:
Sonia Hernandez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hartford v. Kilgore
as 1:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Jimmy Dale Hartford
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Godines-Alvarez v. Neeley
as 7:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Mayra Godines-Alvarez
Defendant:
Kimberly Neeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
