Smith v. Mitchell et al
Defendant: Chadwick Crabtree
Petitioner: Tony Lee Smith
Respondent: Phillip Mitchell and A.D.O.C.
Case Number: 1:2024cv00234
Filed: February 26, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: John H England
Referring Judge: Anna M Manasco
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE-Accordingly, the respondents are ORDERED to appear and show cause in writing within 30 days why the petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 04/18/2024. (AKD)
April 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER- Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to substitute Warden Chadwick Crabtree as the respondent in this action and terminate Phillip Mitchell's status as the respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 04/18/2024. (AKD)
April 8, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Tony Lee Smith (AKD)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to file this action without prepayment of a fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 03/19/2024. (AKD)
March 14, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tony Lee Smith. (AKD)
February 27, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER-The petitioner has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee of $5. The petitioner must file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee of $5 to the Clerk of Court. The petitioner must correct this deficiency within 30 days. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the form application to proceed in forma pauperis on the petitioner along with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 02/27/2024. (AKD)
February 26, 2024 Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re Case Number (AKD)
February 26, 2024 Filing 2 REQUEST For Permission to File Lesser Number of Habeas Corpus Petitons by Tony Lee Smith (AKD)
February 26, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Tony Lee Smith.(AKD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Mitchell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tony Lee Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Phillip Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: A.D.O.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chadwick Crabtree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?