District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Death Penalty Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Davis v. Gordy et al
as 1:2016cv01041
Petitioner: Derrick Lamar Davis
Respondent: Christopher Gordy, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yeomans v. Dunn (DEATH PENALTY)
as 1:2016cv00455
Plaintiff: James Donald Yeomans
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2016cv00364
Plaintiff: David Wilson
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Dunn (DEATH PENALTY)
as 1:2016cv00348
Plaintiff: James Earl Walker
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madison v. Dunn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00191
Petitioner: Vernon Madison
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
McNabb v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00284
Plaintiff: Torrey Twane McNabb
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00270
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Todd West
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00269
Plaintiff: Ronald Bert Smith
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Melson v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00268
Plaintiff: Robert Bryant Melson
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Dunn et al (DEATHPENALTY)(MEMBER)
as 2:2016cv00267
Plaintiff: Charles Lee Burton
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?