Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,514
Gilmore v. USA
as 1:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Vanda Maurice Gilmore
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dillard v. USA
as 2:2024cv00246
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lametrius Dillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Butler v. State of Alabama
as 3:2024cv00931
Petitioner:
Teddy Butler, Jr
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whigan v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00399
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lang Whigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. USA
as 1:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Terrell D. Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cogburn v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Willis Cogburn
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McCaa v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Cedriquez McCaa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Craig v. USA
as 1:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Cornelius Kenyatta Craig
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McCaa v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Cedriquez McCaa
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walter v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv08019
Petitioner:
Benjamin Eugene Walter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
