US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,364
McDaniel v. Folks
as 1:2024cv00230
Petitioner: Kenneth McDaniel
Respondent: Sharon Folks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodyard v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff: Draper Frank Woodyard
Defendant: Baldwin County Sheriff's Department, Hoss Mack, Deputy McNeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penez v. Naphcare et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: Gilbert J. Penez
Defendant: Naphcare, Altapoint and Metro Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. USA
as 1:2024cv00232
Petitioner: Terrell D. Smith
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. Langham
as 1:2024cv00223
Petitioner: Buddie Lamar Jackson
Respondent: Sharon Langham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marbury v. Wright et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff: Anthony L. Marbury
Defendant: Willie Wright and Rhonda Westmoreland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Craig v. USA
as 1:2024cv00222
Petitioner: Cornelius Kenyatta Craig
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cooley v. The State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00215
Petitioner: Jason Cooley
Defendant: The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodyard v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00210
Plaintiff: Draper Frank Woodyard
Defendant: Baldwin County Sheriff's Department, Alabama Department of Corrections and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Travis v. Hamm
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner: Wayne Holleman Travis
Respondent: John Q. Hamm

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?