Southern District of Alabama Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,191
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CEI Community Ventures Fund LLC et al
as 1:2017mc00013
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CEI Community Ventures Fund LLC
Receiver:
United States Small Business Administration
Chamberlain v. State Of Alabama
as 1:2017cv00425
Petitioner:
Nkosi Chamberlain
Respondent:
State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Partridge v. Equifax, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
Barron Partridge
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Property Damage
Sam v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Sam
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hudson et al v. Illinois Central Railroad Company et al
as 1:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hudson , Thomas Early Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company , David W. Myers , Canadian National Railway Company
and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Evans v. Natir, LLC, et al
as 1:2017mc00012
Plaintiff:
Scot Evans
Defendant:
Natir, LLC, Darnell Fuqua, Darrell Kelsoe
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Barnes et al v. Town Council of Perdido Beach, AL
as 1:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Barnes , Chris Chandler , Jan B. Chandler
Defendant:
Town Council of Perdido Beach, AL
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
Carnathan et al v. Valic Financial Advisors et al
as 1:2017cv00420
Plaintiff:
Herbert G. Carnathan , Jill McFarland Carnathan
Defendant:
Valic Financial Advisors , Dan Rollo
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mask v. Strategic Restaurants Acquisition Co., LLC
as 1:2017cv00421
Plaintiff:
Howard Stephen Mask
Defendant:
Strategic Restaurants Acquisition Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00416
Plaintiff:
Yashica C. Jones
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
