US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,560
Seay v. Price
as 1:2020cv00515
Respondent:
Noah Trey Oliver Price, III
Petitioner:
Harvey Beethoven Seay, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DSV Air & Sea, Inc. v. BBC Chartering Carriers GMBH & Co. KG et al
as 1:2020cv00516
Defendant:
Premier Bulk Stevedoring, LLC, BBC Chartering Carriers GMBH & Co. KG, BBC Chartering USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
DSV Air & Sea, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Marine Tort/Collision/Allision
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. City of Mobile et al
as 1:2020cv00514
Defendant:
City Of Mobile, Ladd Peebles Stadium
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Smith v. Singletary et al
as 2:2020cv00513
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Austin Tyler Singletary
Plaintiff:
Theopolis Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Diversity Action
Conner v. Dunn
as 1:2020cv00511
Petitioner:
Willie Lee Conner
Respondent:
Commissioner Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Moseley v. Cochran
as 1:2020cv00512
Defendant:
National General Insurance Company, Mary Reeves Cochran
Plaintiff:
Robert Shalene Moseley
Cause Of Action: Diversity Action
Harper Engineering Company v. FACC AG
as 1:2020cv00510
Plaintiff:
Harper Engineering Company
Defendant:
FACC AG
Mitchell v. Cook et al
as 1:2020cv00509
Plaintiff:
Ernest Allen Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Knight, Arresting Officer, David Jones
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00508
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kizzy Simmons
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Wade v. Walker et al
as 1:2020cv00507
Defendant:
Thaddeus N. Walker, Jr., SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc., Rooms to Go Alabama Corp.
Plaintiff:
Randal Blake Wade
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
