Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 77,158
H0WARD v. BROTON
as 4:2024cv00187
Petitioner:
KIRK H0WARD
Respondent:
JENNIFER A BROTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
CARLOS S KENON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASEY v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M CASEY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIVENS v. SZCZECINA
as 4:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
JEROME E BIVENS
Respondent:
M SZCZECINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babecki v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00417
Petitioner:
Anthony R. Babecki
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins v. Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institute
as 8:2024cv01019
Petitioner:
Alfonzo Damien Adkins
Respondent:
Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrell v. Gaston et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Chantea Tamika Terrell
Defendant:
Sergeant Gaston and Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lagrandeur v. Witt et al
as 2:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lagrandeur
Defendant:
Witt, J. Steider, Z and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jason MacDonald
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turem v. Citrus County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Turem
Defendant:
Citrus County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
