MacDonald v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
| Jason MacDonald |
| Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida, Mark S. Blechman, George Frank, Jennifer Garcia, Jason Fenderson, Ashley B. Moody, FNU Talbot, Leslie Hoffman Price, Zachary C Bolitho, Jeffrey Brown, T. Knight, Jeffrey Danziger and Ronald Murdock |
| 5:2024cv00217 |
| April 29, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Timothy J Corrigan |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice; directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Corrigan on 6/27/2024. (CAW)
|
Filing 10
ORDER to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to amend on courts forms and to either pay filing fee or file application to proceed in forma pauperis as to Jason MacDonald. Show cause response due within 21 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/31/2024. (KLS)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Attorney General, Mark S. Blechman, Zachary C Bolitho, Jeffrey Brown, Jeffrey Danziger, Jason Fenderson, George Frank, Jennifer Garcia, Leslie Hoffman Price, T. Knight, Ashley B. Moody, Ronald Murdock, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, and FNU Talbot filed by Jason MacDonald. (No service copies provided) Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Jason MacDonald.(MGB) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Amend and denying as premature #6 Motion to Compel Discovery. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in accordance with #4 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/20/2024. (KLS)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Jason MacDonald. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MGB) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Compel Discovery by Jason MacDonald. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MGB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint titled "Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint" by Jason MacDonald. (MGB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/15/2024: #1 Mailing Envelope) (MGB). |
Filing 4
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed as pauper, he must file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, financial certificate, prisoner consent form and 6-month account statement within 21 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint form marked "Amended Complaint," a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis, financial certificate and prisoner consent form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/3/2024. (KLS)
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 4/29/2024. (RLK)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jason MacDonald. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida filed by Jason MacDonald.(no service copies provided)(RLK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.