Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,109
CASEY v. DIXON
as 4:2025cv00131
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CASEY
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt, Kevin v. Wellpath Health Services
as 0:2025cv60536
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lavon Pratt
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Martir, Juan v. Miami-Dade Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2025cv21320
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Martir
Defendant:
Miami-Dade Department of Corrections and Metro West Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellard v. Bennett
as 3:2025cv00308
Plaintiff:
James S. Ellard
Defendant:
Officer Sarah Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHEN v. Carlton et al
as 1:2025cv21300
Petitioner:
JIU XIANG CHEN
Respondent:
Warden E.K. Carlton, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez, Ralph v. Martin Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2025cv14091
Plaintiff:
Ralph Xavier Perez
Defendant:
Martin Correctional Institution, C. Martens, J. Garlobo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2025cv00296
Plaintiff:
Barton Coy Hill
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edgell v. Sheriff, Lee County
as 2:2025cv00225
Plaintiff:
Andrew Edgell
Defendant:
Sheriff, Lee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VATHIS v. SPRINGFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2025cv00073
Plaintiff:
ROBIN A VATHIS
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAZMIN ORTIZ and G MATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRADY v. OFFICERS
as 3:2025cv00273
Plaintiff:
KAREEM S GRADY
Defendant:
OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
