Mohammad Sharifi v. Warden Holman CF
| MOHAMMAD SHARIFI |
| HOLMAN CF WARDEN |
| 24-11280 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 USDC Order Denying COA as to Appellant Mohammad Sharifi was filed on 03/20/2024. Docket Entry 196. [Entered: 04/25/2024 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 DEATH PENALTY APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by John Anthony Palombi and Matt D. Schulz for Appellant Mohammad Sharifi on 04/19/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/25/2024 12:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mohammad Sharifi v. Warden Holman CF | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MOHAMMAD SHARIFI | |
| Represented By: | John Anthony Palombi |
| Represented By: | Matt D. Schulz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: HOLMAN CF WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Richard Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
