Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Mohammad Sharifi v. Warden Holman CF
as 24-11025
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD SHARIFI
Respondent:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Kenneth Eugene Smith v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10095
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EUGENE SMITH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HOLMAN CF WARDEN
James Edward Barber v. Governor of the State of Alabama, et al
as 23-12242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD BARBER
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HOLMAN CF WARDEN and others
Timothy Boyle v. Warden, Holman CF, et al
as 23-11073
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT BOYLE
Respondent / Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Nicholas Bernard Acklin v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13599
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS BERNARD ACKLIN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Ulysses Charles Sneed v. Warden Holman CF
as 22-13328
Petitioner / Appellant:
ULYSSES CHARLES SNEED
Respondent / Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Alan Eugene Miller v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13136
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALAN EUGENE MILLER
Defendant / Appellant:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HOLMAN CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Joe Nathan James, Jr v. Warden, Holman Prison, et al
as 22-12346
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE NATHAN JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Robert Shawn Ingram v. Warden Holman CF
as 22-11459
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT SHAWN INGRAM
Respondent / Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Matthew Reeves v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-10064
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MATTHEW REEVES
Defendant / Appellant:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
