Robert Shawn Ingram v. Warden Holman CF
| ROBERT SHAWN INGRAM |
| HOLMAN CF WARDEN |
| 22-11459 |
| April 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Robert Shawn Ingram v. Warden, Holman Correctional Facility
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reply to response filed by Appellant Robert Shawn Ingram. [22-11459] (ECF: John Palombi) [Entered: 05/31/2022 03:26 PM] |
| RESPONSE to Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Robert Shawn Ingram [ # 9670230-2 ] filed by Attorney Beth Jackson Hughes for Appellee Holman CF Warden. [22-11459] (ECF: Beth Hughes) [Entered: 05/23/2022 03:19 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Beth Jackson Hughes for Appellee Holman CF Warden. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11459] (ECF: Beth Hughes) [Entered: 05/17/2022 12:39 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney John Anthony Palombi for Appellant Robert Shawn Ingram. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-11459] (ECF: John Palombi) [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:17 PM] |
| MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Robert Shawn Ingram. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9670230-1] [22-11459] (ECF: John Palombi) [Entered: 05/16/2022 11:54 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Lucie T. Butner for Appellant [22-11459] (ECF: Lucie Butner) [Entered: 05/04/2022 04:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Beth Jackson Hughes for Holman CF Warden. [22-11459] (ECF: Beth Hughes) [Entered: 05/02/2022 04:22 PM] |
| USDC Order Denying COA as to Appellant Robert Shawn Ingram was filed on 03/31/2022. Docket Entry 45. [Entered: 05/02/2022 01:08 PM] |
| DEATH PENALTY APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Attorney John Anthony Palombi for Appellant Robert Shawn Ingram on 04/27/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 05/02/2022 12:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert Shawn Ingram v. Warden Holman CF | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ROBERT SHAWN INGRAM | |
| Represented By: | John Anthony Palombi |
| Represented By: | Lucie T. Butner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: HOLMAN CF WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Beth Jackson Hughes |
| Represented By: | Stephen Frisby |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
