Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,024
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 24-70008
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Irving Alvin Davis
Joubert v. Lumpkin
as 24-70007
Petitioner:
Elijah Dwayne Joubert
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bennett v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Defendant:
Commisioner Burl Cain, Superintendent Marc McClure and Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Charles Blanchard
Plaintiff:
Devin Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 24-70006
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Davis
White v. Lumpkin
as 24-70005
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Garcia Glenn White
Rubio v. Lumpkin
as 24-70004
Petitioner:
John Allen Rubio
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Reed v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00726
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Rodney Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galloway v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Leslie Galloway, III
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Marc McClure and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Charles Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Cruz-Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-70003
Petitioner:
Obel Cruz-Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Delacruz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Isidro Miguel Delacruz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
