Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 164,278
Carson v. City of Vicksburg et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff: Phillip Carson
Defendant: City of Vicksburg, Robert Doe WC 74, Lt. Jeff Merritt and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varnado v. Huffman et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff: Carlos Varnado
Defendant: Brad Huffman, Ronald King, Unknown Canale and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphey v. USA
as 3:2024cv00649
Petitioner: Melanie L Murphey
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Alonso v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00968
Petitioner: Ralph Ernest Alonso
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00967
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner: Richard James Johnson
Respondent: Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hille v. Midland County Detention Center et al
as 7:2024cv00081
Plaintiff: Drevon Hille
Defendant: Midland County Detention Center and Officer Quintana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zapata v. USA
as 4:2024cv00234
Petitioner: German Zapata
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Dunham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00247
Petitioner: Thomas Eugene Dunham
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Griffis
as 7:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Lyndon Walker
Defendant: Sheriff Mike Griffis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?