Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 165,244
Rector v. Director, TDCJ
as 4:2024cv01741
Plaintiff:
Lonnie H Rector, Jr
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01749
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Joseph Davis, Gabriel Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyner v. Arnold et al
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Scott Tyner
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Arnold, Warden Unknown Brown, Unit Manager Loretta Crockett and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Howard County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jim Bob White
Defendant:
Howard County Sheriffs Office, Simon Munoz, John Doe 1:24-cv-00069 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baiza v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Timothy Baiza
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Tiffany Graves, Myra Nkule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirksey v. Leseur et al
as 7:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Kirksey
Defendant:
Chief FNU Leseur and C. Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Hank E Clark
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orellana-Hernandez v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Santos Orellana-Hernandez
Defendant:
F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Keys v. Wilkins
as 24-60218
Petitioner:
Joseph Benjamin Keys
Respondent:
James Wilkins, Warden, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
