Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 58,467
Stevenson v. Grieve et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brad Stevenson
Defendant:
FNU Grieve and J Leet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Anthony Smith
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruff v. McCulloch et al
as 7:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D Ruff
Defendant:
Robin McCulloch, Lori Hodgkins, Atticus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanfield v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stanfield and Randy Jones
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier and Unknown Loosier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edget v. State of Mississippi
as 24-60221
Plaintiff:
Hudson Lynn Edget
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Coe v. Martinez-New et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Brenton L Coe
Respondent:
Julia Martinez-New, FNU Cozbi, FNU Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Trevino
as 6:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Texas City Police Officer et al
as 4:2024cv01758
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Stewart
Defendant:
Texas City Police Oficer and Texas City Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Howard County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jim Bob White
Defendant:
Howard County Sheriffs Office, Simon Munoz, John Doe 1:24-cv-00069 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Warden Via Lobos et al
as 4:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Robert H Duncan
Defendant:
Warden Via Lobos, Bryan Collier, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
