District of Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 1,530
Montgomery v. Loper et al
as 1:2015cv00087
Plaintiff: Stanley Montgomery
Defendant: Joseph H. Loper, Jr., Marshall Fisher, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Lauderdale County et al
as 3:2015cv00352
Plaintiff: Stacie Nichole Dunn
Defendant: Lauderdale County, Ken Dulaney, William D. Sollie and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Winder v. J. et al
as 4:2015cv00055
Plaintiff: Anthony Winder
Defendant: Burke J., Annie Bouler, Madubuonwu Parl and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Kirklin et al
as 4:2015cv00054
Plaintiff: Phillip Earl Young
Defendant: Robert Kirklin, Hallie Gail Bridges, Martha Grant Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Jones et al
as 4:2015cv00053
Plaintiff: Kelvin James Taylor
Defendant: Charles Jones, Kelvin Williams, Marcia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hays v. Granderson et al
as 4:2015cv00051
Plaintiff: Howard Hays
Defendant: Byron Granderson, City of Greenwood Police Department, Municipal of Leflore
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Davis et al
as 4:2015cv00050
Plaintiff: James Mack
Defendant: Roger Davis, Stanley Brooks, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Fisher et al
as 4:2015cv00045
Plaintiff: Stanley Montgomery
Defendant: Marshall Fisher, Earnest Lee, Gloria Gibbs
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ducksworth v. Bobo et al
as 4:2015cv00047
Plaintiff: Nora Ducksworth
Defendant: J Bobo, Carolyn Walker, J Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. Pearl River County et al
as 1:2015cv00127
Plaintiff: Christopher Beltran
Defendant: Pearl River County, David Allison
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.