District Court Cases in Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Brown v. Steuer et al
as 3:2026cv00250
Plaintiff:
Tarsha L. Brown
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Steuer, MD, Dr. Menon, MD, Melburn Christopher Garrett, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Keaton v. Mississippi Delta Community College et al
as 4:2026cv00162
Plaintiff:
Cameron Keaton
Defendant:
Mississippi Delta Community College, City of Moorhead, Mississippi, Indianola Family Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. USA
as 3:2026cv00710
Petitioner:
Waltravious Leeandre Watson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Owens v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2026cv00249
Petitioner:
Michael Owens
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendricks v. United States of America
as 2:2026cv00137
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Kendricks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Sullivan v. Taylor
as 1:2026cv00249
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniel Sullivan
Defendant:
Joshua David Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
