District of Mississippi Court Cases

Cases filed


Cases 21 - 30 of 47,730
Keel v. Robinson et al
as 4:2018cv00224
Plaintiff: James Keel
Defendant: M.D.O.C. Records Dept., Karen Robinson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00780
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Race)
Word v. Saddle Creek Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00197
Plaintiff: Patricia Word
Defendant: Saddle Creek Corporation, Saddle Creek Logistics Services, John Does 1 - 5
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)
Martinez et al v. Hancock County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00354
Defendant: Hancock County, Mississippi, Milton Aric Latschar, John Doe # 2 and others
Plaintiff: Stephanie Martinez, Marcos Martinez
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Morris
as 2:2018cv00189
Defendant: Robert Morris
Plaintiff: Devantae A. Moore
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Melton v. Centurion et al
as 5:2018cv00121
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Centurion, Dr. J. Burke
Plaintiff: Barry Lemax Melton
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins et al v. Fitts et al
as 1:2018cv00198
Plaintiff: Jason Rollins, Eric Powell
Defendant: Edward Fitts, E & J Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hall v. Paper Converting Machine Company
as 5:2018cv00120
Defendant: Paper Converting Machine Company
Plaintiff: David Hall
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Notice of Removal
Little v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00777
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Anthony Little
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Contract Insurance
Parks v. Shaw
as 1:2018cv00355
Plaintiff: George Lee Parks
Defendant: Frank Shaw
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?