Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 11,805
Smith v. Errington
as 1:2019cv00289
Plaintiff: Willie Ed Smith
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Joe Errington
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton v. Bohlke et al
as 3:2019cv00106
Defendant: Thomas J. Bohlke, James E. Rambo
Plaintiff: Willie Hampton
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Brazier et al
as 3:2019cv00348
Plaintiff: Patricia Brown
Defendant: Dr. Brazier, Sandra Lampkin
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Tunica County Mississippi, Municipal Corporation, Collectivley Defendants Individually et al
as 3:2019cv00103
Plaintiff: Willie Hampton
Defendant: Lt. Jerome Hudson, Thomas J. Bohlke, Agent James Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Sayadi-Takhtehkar v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00043
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: Hamid Reza Sayadi-Takhtehkar
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DEARING v. MONROE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT et al
as 1:2019cv00096
Respondent: State of Mississippi, Monroe County Circuit Court
Petitioner: Dewayne Dearing
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Wilson
as 1:2019cv00094
Respondent: Warden Eric D. Wilson
Petitioner: James Bradley Cook
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Woods v. USA
as 1:2019cv00281
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Erin Woods
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ramirez v. Medical Staff et al
as 2:2019cv00075
Defendant: Forrest County Correction Officers, Forrest Co. Jail, Medical Staff
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Ramon Ramirez
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lett v. Errington
as 1:2019cv00280
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Edwin Darrell Lett
Defendant: Joe Errington
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?