U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 434
Cruz-Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-70003
Petitioner:
Obel Cruz-Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Wells v. Lumpkin
as 24-70002
Petitioner:
Amos Wells
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Granger v. Lumpkin
as 24-70001
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Granger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Pitchford v. Cain
as 23-70009
Petitioner:
Terry Pitchford
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Lynn Fitch, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Ricks v. Lumpkin
as 23-70008
Petitioner:
Cedric Allen Ricks
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Renteria v. Lumpkin
as 23-70007
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Santiago Renteria
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Lizcano v. Lumpkin
as 23-70006
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Lizcano
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Murphy v. Nasser
as 23-70005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jedidiah Isaac Murphy
Defendant / Appellant:
Ali Mustapha Nasser
Brown v. Lumpkin
as 23-70004
Petitioner / Appellant:
Micah Brown
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 23-70003
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Medina
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
