California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 308
Theodore Shove v. State of California et al
as 2:2023cv01227
Petitioner:
Theodore Shove
Respondent:
State of California and U.S. District Court Central District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Douglas Oliver Kelly v. Ronald Broomfield
as 2:2022cv06460
Petitioner:
Douglas Oliver Kelly
Respondent:
Ronald Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
James Michael Fayed v. Warden SQSP
as 2:2022cv05120
Petitioner:
James M. Fayed
Respondent:
Warden SQSP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
(DP) Bolin v. State of California

as 1:2022cv00728
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Paul C. Bolin v. State of California
as 2:2022cv03925
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Christopher James Sattiewhite v. Warden
as 2:2022cv00127
Petitioner:
Christopher James Sattiewhite
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Masters v. Broomfield

as 4:2020cv08206
Petitioner:
Jarvis J Masters
Respondent:
Acting Warden, Calif Ron Broomfield
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Corpus Resource Center, Habeas Capital Notification and California Appellate Project
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher James Sattiewhite v. People
as 2:2020cv09125
Respondent:
People
Petitioner:
Christopher James Sattiewhite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Orlando Romero v. Ron Broomfield
as 2:2020cv04717
Petitioner:
Orlando Romero
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hajek v. Broomfield

as 5:2020cv02568
Defendant:
Ronald Broomfield
Petitioner:
Stephen Edward Hajek
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ronald Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.