California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 317
Googie Harris Sr v. Darryl Exum Esq.
as 5:2025cv00136
Petitioner:
Googie Harris, Sr.
Respondent:
Darryl Exum Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Rickey R. Madison v. Bill Phillips
as 2:2024cv05741
Respondent:
Bill Phillips
Petitioner:
Rickey R. Madison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jesse Allen Morrison v. Leanna Lundy
as 2:2024cv01850
Petitioner:
Jesse Allen Morrison
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sandi Dawn Nieves v. Anissa De La Cruz
as 2:2024cv00642
Petitioner:
Sandi Dawn Nieves
Respondent:
Anissa De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prentice Juan Snow v. Gena Jones
as 2:2023cv09424
Petitioner:
Prentice Juan Snow
Respondent:
Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Rey Fierro v. Charles Schuyler
as 2:2023cv09180
Petitioner:
David Rey Fierro
Respondent:
Charles Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(DP) Vieira v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Richard John Vieira
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Andrew Lancaster v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 2:2023cv05122
Petitioner:
Andrew Lancaster
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demetrius Howard v. Oak Smith
as 5:2023cv00705
Petitioner:
Demetrius Howard
Respondent:
Oak Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Theodore Shove v. State of California et al
as 2:2023cv01227
Petitioner:
Theodore Shove
Respondent:
State of California and U.S. District Court Central District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
