Prentice Juan Snow v. Gena Jones
Petitioner: Prentice Juan Snow
Respondent: Gena Jones
Case Number: 2:2023cv09424
Filed: November 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Patricia Donahue
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Herbert S. Tetef on behalf of Respondent Gena Jones. (Attorney Herbert S Tetef added to party Gena Jones(pty:res))(Tetef, Herbert)
January 3, 2024 Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Marta Maria VanLandingham counsel for Petitioner Prentice Juan Snow. Adding Marta VanLandingham as counsel of record for Prentice Juan Snow for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Petitioner Prentice Juan Snow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Attorney Marta Maria VanLandingham added to party Prentice Juan Snow(pty:pet))(VanLandingham, Marta)
January 3, 2024 Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jasmine Chandulal Patel counsel for Petitioner Prentice Juan Snow. Adding Jasmine Patel as counsel of record for Prentice Juan Snow for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Petitioner Prentice Juan Snow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Attorney Jasmine Chandulal Patel added to party Prentice Juan Snow(pty:pet))(Patel, Jasmine)
December 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. IT IS ORDERED: that No later than January 8, 2024, Respondent shall file a Notice of Appearance. No later than April 8, 2024, Respondent shall file and serve either a motion to dismiss the Petition or an answer. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 of 5, #2 Attachment 2 of 5, #3 Attachment 3 of 5, #4 Attachment 4 of 5, #5 Attachment 5 of 5) (es)
December 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Granting Request for Appointment of Counsel [Dkt. No. 3] by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue: granting #3 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel. The Office of the Federal Public Defender is appointed to represent Petitioner to prosecute the claims asserted in the Petition. (lom)
December 12, 2023 Filing 6 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 Final initial partial filing fee from plaintiff Prentice Juan Snow on 12/12/2023, receipt number 11049, re: Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P), #5 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (ash)
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (HABEAS) #2 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The Request is DENIED because Petitioner has the ability to pay. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, Petitioner must do the following: Petitioner must pay the $5 filing fee. His account statement shows an available balance of $168.14. If Petitioner does not comply with these instructions within 30 days, this case will be DISMISSED without prejudice. (lc)
November 14, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap)
November 8, 2023 Filing 3 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel; DECLARATION OF ELLISE NICHOLSON; DECLARATION OF K. ELIZABETH DAHLSTROM filed by petitioner Prentice Juan Snow. (ghap)
November 8, 2023 Filing 2 PRISONER'S REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by petitioner Prentice Juan Snow. (ghap)
November 8, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Prentice Juan Snow. (Attachments: #1 2254 Part 2, #2 2254 Part 3, #3 2254 Part 4, #4 2254 Part 5) (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prentice Juan Snow v. Gena Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Prentice Juan Snow
Represented By: Jasmine Chandulal Patel
Represented By: Marta Maria VanLandingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gena Jones
Represented By: Herbert S Tetef
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?