Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Death Penalty Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 175
Mahdi v. Stirling
as 8:2016cv03911
Petitioner: Mikal D Mahdi
Respondent: Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Thomas Porter v. David Zook
as 16-18
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS ALEXANDER PORTER
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
James Morgan v. Carlton Joyner
as 16-17
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES LEWIS MORGAN
Respondent - Appellee: CARLTON B. JOYNER, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Ivan Teleguz v. David Zook
as 16-16
Petitioner - Appellant: IVAN TELEGUZ
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Shan Carter v. Carlton Joyner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-14
Petitioner - Appellant: SHAN EDWARD CARTER
Respondent - Appellee: CARLTON B. JOYNER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Owens v. Stirling et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2016cv02512
Petitioner: Freddie Owens
Respondent: Bryan P Stirling , Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Malakim Israel v. Joseph Hollingsworth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-6840
Plaintiff - Appellant: MALAKIM BEN ISRAEL
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Tilmon Golphin v. Edward Thoma
as 16-12
Petitioner - Appellant: TILMON C. GOLPHIN
Respondent - Appellee: EDWARD THOMAS, Warden of Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Marcus Robinson v. Edward Thoma
as 16-11
Petitioner - Appellant: MARCUS REYMOND ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee: EDWARD THOMAS, Warden of Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Williams v. Stirling et al
as 6:2016cv01655
Petitioner: Charles Christopher Williams
Respondent: Bryan P Stirling , Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?