Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Death Penalty Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 202
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE DOCKETED IN 5:24-HC-2042-BO. White
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner: Melvin Lee White, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White
as 5:2024hc02042
Petitioner: Melvin Lee White, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Aquilia Barnette
as 24-1
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: AQUILIA MARCIVICCI BARNETTE
Torres v. Stirling et al
as 6:2023cv04659
Petitioner: Andres Antonio Torres
Respondent: Bryan P. Stirling, Kenneth Nelson and Lydell Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
In re: Elizabeth Peiffer
as 23-5
Appellant: In re: ELIZABETH JANE PEIFFER
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID ANTHONY RUNYON
Amicus Curiae: JAMES MICHAEL MCCAULEY, Esq. and PROFESSOR JAMES E. MOLITERNO
Stephen Bryant v. Bryan Stirling
as 23-4
Petitioner / Appellant: STEPHEN COREY BRYANT
Respondent / Appellee: BRYAN P. STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and LYDELL CHESTNUT, Deputy Warden, Broad River Road Correctional Institution Secure Facility
Frazier v. Warden of Lieber We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00953
Petitioner: Sharod Frazier
Respondent: Warden of Lieber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Brandon Basham
as 23-3
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: BRANDON LEON BASHAM
US v. Chadrick Fulks
as 23-2
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CHADRICK EVAN FULKS
US v. James Roane, Jr.
as 23-1
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JAMES H. ROANE, JR., a/k/a J.R.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?