US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 81,664
Knox v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv06275
Petitioner:
Tito L. Knox
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. South Carolina State Police et al
as 4:2023cv06265
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina State Police and Myrtle Beach Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Glynndeavin v. Gergel et al
as 2:2023cv06273
Plaintiff:
Von Fox Glynndeavin
Defendant:
Judge Richard Gergel and Judge Mary Gordon Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hawley v. United States Army Fort Jackson Criminal Investigation Division
as 3:2023cv06270
Plaintiff:
Erin Hawley
Defendant:
United States Army Fort Jackson Criminal Investigation Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Wheeler v. Korolyshyn et al
as 2:2023cv06254
Plaintiff:
Roger Wheeler
Defendant:
Andriy Korolyshyn and Kovalyk Volodymyr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Govan v. Coastal Walls and Ceiling et al
as 4:2023cv06244
Plaintiff:
Duane Govan
Defendant:
Coastal Walls and Ceiling, John Does 1-10, William Arnold and others
Roberts v. Dodge Data and Analytics
as 6:2023cv06243
Plaintiff:
Brian T Roberts
Defendant:
Dodge Data and Analytics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Caldwell v. U.S. Postal Service
as 0:2023cv06251
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Caldwell
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Herbert v. McCall et al
as 4:2023cv06242
Plaintiff:
Terrell Herbert
Defendant:
Chaquez T McCall, McCall Law Firm and Kelli Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
