US District Court for the District of South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25,182
Millbrooks v. Barnett et al
as 6:2024cv04864
Defendant:
Scotty Bodiford, Morgan Shankle, Anna Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Millbrooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Knox v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 6:2024cv04865
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Carlos Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Warren v. USA
as 4:2024cv04834
Petitioner:
Robert Anton Warren
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Benson v. Janson
as 0:2024cv04841
Respondent:
Warden Jansen, FCI Edgefield and Warden Janson
Petitioner:
Rahshjeem Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clea, Jr. v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv04847
Plaintiff:
Glenn Clea, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Franklin v. Palmer
as 1:2024cv04773
Respondent:
John Palmer
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Franklin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Munnerlyn et al
as 4:2024cv04775
Plaintiff:
Damiane McCoy
Defendant:
Dellon Power and Elizabeth Munnerlyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. USA
as 6:2024cv04789
Petitioner:
Antonio Marques Dominique Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thomas v. Moates
as 6:2024cv04779
Plaintiff:
Thomas Capell
Defendant:
Andrew R Moates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Alston v. Lawson et al
as 2:2024cv04780
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Jennifer, Elizabeth Lawson, Chasidy Queen and others
Plaintiff:
William Joshua Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
