Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases

Death Penalty Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Fry v. Shoop
as 1:2019cv02307
Defendant: Warden Timothy Shoop
Plaintiff: Clarence Fry
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Obermiller v. Shoop
as 1:2019cv02193
Respondent: Warden Timothy Shoop
Petitioner: Denny Obermiller
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Shoop
as 5:2019cv02063
Petitioner: Phillip L. Jones
Respondent: Warden Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanna v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2019cv00231
Respondent: Tim Shoop
Petitioner: James Hanna
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens v. Shoop
as 1:2019cv00558
Petitioner: Mark Pickens
Respondent: Warden Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spaulding v. Shoop
as 5:2019cv01548
Petitioner: Dawud Spaulding
Respondent: Warden Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wogenstahl v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2019cv00403
Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Jeffrey A Wogenstahl
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Short v. WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 3:2019cv00052
Petitioner: Duane Short
Respondent: WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Shoop
as 1:2018cv00934
Petitioner: Jeremiah Jackson
Respondent: Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00215
Petitioner: Kareem Jackson
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?