District Court Cases in Ohio
Cases 41 - 50 of 166,131
Fontenot v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Fontenot
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jordan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02248
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Jordan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kaplan v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Kaplan
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keller v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02257
Plaintiff:
Tommy Keller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Loving v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv02236
Plaintiff:
Andrew Loving
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bordelon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
John Bordelon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Balotti v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02228
Plaintiff:
Samuel Balotti
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lenio v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02232
Plaintiff:
Gary Lenio
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrison v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02229
Plaintiff:
Karen Harrison
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NEW v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv02253
Plaintiff:
JOELLE NEW
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Officer John Doe #1 and Officer John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
