Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 55,247
Blankenship v. Peoples Bank
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Peoples Bank and Limestone Bank
Plaintiff:
Earl Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Franks v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al.
as 3:2023cv01845
Plaintiff:
Carrie Franks
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Access Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frieling v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Martin Frieling
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blake v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03059
Plaintiff:
Glenn Blake
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Briggs v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03064
Plaintiff:
David Briggs, III
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Borghesi v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03061
Plaintiff:
Michael Borghesi
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hadley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03067
Plaintiff:
Floyd Hadley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vicari v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03066
Plaintiff:
Frances Vicari
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Briseno v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03065
Plaintiff:
Natalie Briseno
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bridges v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03063
Plaintiff:
Calvin Bridges
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
