Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 52,543
Raines III v. DePuy International Limited et al
as 1:2022dp20036
Plaintiff:
Roy Lesley Raines III
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, Depuy Inc., DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Urquidez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04208
Plaintiff:
Abraham Urquidez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Camacho v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04210
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Camacho
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sibley et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04211
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sibley and Linda Sibley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith Ashworth et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04212
Plaintiff:
Linda Smith Ashworth and Michael Ashworth
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tanner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04213
Plaintiff:
Willard Tanner
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04214
Plaintiff:
Tova Brown
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Samdahl v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04215
Plaintiff:
Beth Samdahl
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Voyles v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04216
Plaintiff:
Angela Voyles
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pope v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04217
Plaintiff:
Richard Pope
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
