District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,738
Rounding v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00574
Defendant:
Davol Inc, C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rounding
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Olivo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00571
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Olivo
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Reid v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00573
Defendant:
Davol Inc, C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Reid
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jenni Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Rosado v. Mareg Transport, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00362
Defendant:
Sakariye Hassan Jilaow, Mareg Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rosado
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Saravo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00570
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eugene S. Saravo
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Prusock et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00364
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc., Zhejiang Yongyu Bamboo Joint-Stock Co., Ltd, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
George M. Prusock, Julie Prusock
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Spier v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00569
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary H. Spier
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45078
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma Inc, McKesson Corporation, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC.;
and others
Plaintiff:
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gentry v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00561
Defendant:
Davol Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Gentry
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
