District Court Cases in Michigan
Cases 1 - 10 of 161,165
Moncrief v. CMFG Life Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv13463
Plaintiff:
Nellie Moncrief
Defendant:
CMFG Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv13467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv13468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv13470
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Ervin v. Morrison
as 2:2024cv13464
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Petitioner:
Freddie Ervin
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Davis v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv13466
Plaintiff:
Caron Davis
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Search/Seizure Warrant
as 2:2024mc51451
Unknown:
Search/Seizure Warrant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Copenhaver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv13469
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Donielle E. Copenhaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Utica Partners LLC v. Target Corporation
as 2:2024cv13451
Plaintiff:
Utica Partners LLC
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
ERNST v. PROTECTIVE LIFE et al
as 1:2024cv13461
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA ERNST
Defendant:
PROTECTIVE LIFE, PROTECTIVE DISTRIBUTORS, A DIVISION OF FIRST PROTECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP, INC., CONCOURSE FINANCIAL GROUP,, CONCOURSE FINANCIAL GROUP AGENCY, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
