District Court Cases in Michigan
Cases 1 - 10 of 159,854
YLM USA, Inc, v. Robinson Bender Services and Automation, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv12676
Plaintiff:
YLM USA, Inc,
Defendant:
Robinson Bender Services and Automation, Inc. and John Walter Robinson III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. et al v. A.A.A.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv12674
Defendant:
Sarvat Tehmeen, A.A.A.A., Inc. and Majid Hussain
Plaintiff:
LC Trademarks, Inc. and Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Thomas v. 8438048 Canada Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv12679
Plaintiff:
Anwar Thomas
Defendant:
8438048 Canada Inc. Doing business as AMG Global and Zermanpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Mitchell v. Sam's East, Inc
as 2:2024cv12683
Plaintiff:
Gary Mitchell
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Minchella v. Brantley
as 2:2024cv12680
Defendant:
Yvonne Brantley
Plaintiff:
David Minchella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Dobronski v. Dako et al
as 5:2024cv12673
Defendant:
Ardit Dako and Pure Ducts, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hankins et al v. TITMOUSE, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv12682
Defendant:
TITMOUSE, INC., CHRIS PRYNOSKI, AMAZON, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Toya R. Hankins, AMOS ARAUZ and Marcus NMI Amick
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
