Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,604
MONROE SR v. DELLUTRI et al
as 9:2024cv80521
Plaintiff:
SL MONROE SR
Defendant:
JOANNE DELLUTRI, THE HAVEN DETOX LLC and THE RECOVERY TEAM INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Burgess v. The Fourmidable Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11100
Plaintiff:
Summer Burgess
Defendant:
The Fourmidable Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Malic v. Lennox Industries, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Adin Malic
Defendant:
Lennox Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thompson v. A.J. Rose Manufacturing Co.
as 1:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thompson
Defendant:
A.J. Rose Manufacturing Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Parker v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 8:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Josh Parker
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
TILLMON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE D. TILLMON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Chin v. Small Business Administration of the United States et al
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Sherry Chin
Defendant:
Small Business Administration of the United States, Tammie Polk and Zachary Bradford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 w Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Malone v. Continental Tire The Americas, LLC
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Andrew Malone
Defendant:
Continental Tire The Americas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phillips v. Caring et al
as 1:2024cv03006
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Phillips
Defendant:
ELARA CARING, ANANTH MOHAN and SCOTT POWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Duniver v. Cambria Fabshop - Cleveland, LLC
as 5:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
David Duniver
Defendant:
Cambria Fabshop - Cleveland, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
