Third Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,580
GILLIAM v. U.S. MEDICAL STAFFING, INC.
as 2:2023cv04622
Plaintiff:
MELODY GILLIAM
Defendant:
U.S. MEDICAL STAFFING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Ephriam Rodriquez v. SEPTA
as 23-3074
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EPHRIAM RODRIQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
HERNANDEZ v. LATINO COMMISSION ON AIDS
as 2:2023cv04601
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
LATINO COMMISSION ON AIDS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
SIMMONS v. UNION COUNTY
as 2:2023cv22449
Plaintiff:
ANDERA SIMMONS
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
PHILIPPE v. UNION COUNTY
as 2:2023cv22444
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER PHILIPPE
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
BIVINS v. ARISTACARE AT WHITING, LLC
as 1:2023cv22464
Plaintiff:
CANDICE BIVINS
Defendant:
ARISTACARE AT WHITING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
MAHONEY v. DELTA DENTAL OF NJ
as 2:2023cv22445
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MAHONEY
Defendant:
DELTA DENTAL OF NJ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
CARRANZA et al v. EASY PICKINS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv22417
Plaintiff:
JAIRO CARRANZA and KARINA MACHADO
Defendant:
EASY PICKINS, INC., MARA DIAZ and LUZ GARDA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
GUERCIO v. PREFERRED PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01951
Plaintiff:
CASSIDY GUERCIO
Defendant:
PREFERRED PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS, INC., CHARITY DEAN and ANDREA DIMOFF
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
HUGHES v. VALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, INC. D/B/A VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP
as 2:2023cv22211
Plaintiff:
AMBER HUGHES
Defendant:
VALLEY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, INC. D/B/A VALLEY MEDICAL GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
