District of Pennsylvania Court Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 352,165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03210
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BONAPARTE et al v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv03209
Plaintiff: RODNEY BONAPARTE , APRIL KILSON
Defendant: BENSALEM TOWNSHIP, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GREENLAND v. ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2017cv03221
Plaintiff: PETER GREENLAND
Defendant: ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
EAGER v. BERRYHILL
as 5:2017cv03208
Plaintiff: PAMELA GALE EAGER
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
URBAN v. THE HARTFORD
as 2:2017cv03217
Plaintiff: HELEN URBAN
Defendant: THE HARTFORD
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
COLEY v. JONES et al
as 2:2017cv03218
Plaintiff: JOSEPH JACOB COLEY
Defendant: LEAH C. JONES, ROBERT J. DEWEY
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
FLETCHER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE
as 3:2017cv00130
Petitioner: DEMETRIUS FLETCHER
Respondent: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
BRADLEY v. CLARK et al
as 1:2017cv00196
Petitioner: TRACY R. BRADLEY
Respondent: MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAILEY v. CLARK
as 1:2017cv00198
Plaintiff: DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant: MICHAEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bortner et al v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2017cv01271
Plaintiff: Jodie L. Bortner , David M. Hollar
Defendant: Andre D. Kennedy, Any Day or Knight Courier, LLC, May Furniture, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?