District Court Cases in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01793
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01796
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
AUNSPAW v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv01910
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL AUNSPAW
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Acors v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv01906
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Acors
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Alberts v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv01908
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alberts
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Aloia v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv01909
Plaintiff:
Steven Aloia
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
YAKUNIN v. SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
as 2:2026cv01903
Plaintiff:
STANISLAV YAKUNIN
Defendant:
SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
CONNERS v. SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
as 2:2026cv01904
Plaintiff:
RYAN CONNERS
Defendant:
SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
RAMEY v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv06963
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY RAMEY
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
