District Court Cases in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Tucker v. Na et al
as 1:2026cv03165
Defendant:
Schuylkill Center OPCO LLC doing business as Schuylkill Center, Na Na, Jennie Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
H. et al v. ABINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2026cv08156
Plaintiff:
OWEN H., Katie H. and DANIEL H.
Defendant:
ABINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GRILL v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2026cv08168
Plaintiff:
RICHARD F. GRILL
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., KEY BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mullis v. CITY OF READING, et al
as 5:2026cv08157
Plaintiff:
Ryan W Mullis
Defendant:
CITY OF READING, Tanner J Vogel and Shawn Heck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DELPINO v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 5:2026cv08169
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL DELPINO
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08173
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
STIMMELL v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2026cv02322
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STIMMELL
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, RYAN SIGLEY, AMADEUS MARINUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAHAM v. DURYEE
as 1:2026cv00301
Plaintiff:
ROLAND GRAHAM
Defendant:
C. DURYEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
