Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 47,387
SUDLER et al v. UNITED PARKS & RESORTS INC.
as 2:2024cv03322
Plaintiff:
REGINA SUDLER, Z.S., CHARLES FITZGERALD and others
Defendant:
UNITED PARKS & RESORTS INC. doing business as SESAME PLACE PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03325
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Slaughter v. Community Services Group
as 1:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Slaughter
Defendant:
Community Services Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUTALA v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv03279
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, WELLPATH, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. RUTALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
QUINN et al v. CHAVEZ et al
as 2:2024cv03290
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and OFFICER LUIS CHAVEZ
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE QUINN and MICHAEL QUINN, SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03299
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
