District of Pennsylvania Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 36,722
GUIDECRAFT, INC. v. OJCOMMERCE, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01247
Defendant: OJCOMMERCE.COM, INC., OJCOMMERCE, LLC, JACOB WEISS and others
Plaintiff: GUIDECRAFT, INC.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
BUTTOLPH v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2018cv01248
Respondent: MELINDA ADAMS, ANDREW J. BENDER, JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner: STEVEN CARL BUTTOLPH
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WESTERFIELD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2018cv00275
Plaintiff: RONNY J. WESTERFIELD
Defendant: ALEXIS SACARA, MICHAEL CLARK, DOCTOR JOSE BOGGIO and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
PETTAWAY v. ENNIS et al
as 2:2018cv01241
Defendant: PAULA ENNIS, BRYAN E. FLINCHBAUGH
Plaintiff: WAYNE PETTAWAY
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MOLSON v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2018cv00274
Defendant: FAITH HAUGHTON, MARCEL MALLORY, MICHAEL HOLMAN and others
Plaintiff: ROWENA MOLSON
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
STILL v. LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES, INC.
as 2:2018cv01240
Plaintiff: PARILYN STILL
Defendant: LIFESPACE COMMUNITIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SUMMA et al v. PPG ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS N.A.
as 2:2018cv01246
Defendant: PPG ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS N.A.
Plaintiff: JANET MACINTYRE, KATHLEEN SUMMA
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
RODEHEAVER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2018cv00182
Petitioner: BRENTON CODY RODEHEAVER
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01245
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01244
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?