US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,713
LIKAR v. KOHL'S INC.
as 2:2020cv01603
Defendant:
KOHL'S INC.
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA LIKAR
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
LYNN et al v. WALMART STORES EAST, L.P.
as 2:2020cv01608
Plaintiff:
VINCENT LYNN, BONNIE LOUGHNER
Defendant:
WALMART STORES EAST, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
HAMPSHIRE et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
as 2:2020cv01583
Plaintiff:
REBECCA HAMPSHIRE, WILLIAM HAMPSHIRE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
CRAWFORD v. COYLE MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 3:2020cv00212
Plaintiff:
JOAN CRAWFORD
Defendant:
COYLE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
DOWDELL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2020cv01571
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE, APS, COOK INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
JUDY DOWDELL
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
MATTHEWS v. SMITH
as 1:2020cv00302
Defendant:
RYAN E. SMITH
Plaintiff:
GERALD MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
HILSTER et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv01537
Defendant:
CRANE INSTRUMENTATION & SAMPLING, INC., FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS USA, INC.
and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. HILSTER, JR., SHIRLEY A. HILSTER
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
FOX v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv01544
Plaintiff:
DAVID FOX
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Tort Claims Act
GODFREY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv01527
Plaintiff:
TYREE GODFREY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Tort Claim
CORKLIN et al v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00299
Defendant:
MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, LLC, BLUE CHIP 2000 COMMERCIAL CLEANING, INC.
Plaintiff:
KEN CORKLIN, DENISE CORKLIN
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
