US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,310
DIMARCO v. MAY et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
RICKY DIMARCO
Defendant:
METZLER BROTHERS INC doing business as METZLER BROTHERS TRANSPORT INC and ELMER MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
HLARIS et al v. WALMART INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01218
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART INC., WSE MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HLARIS and NADINE HLARIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
JANKOWSKI v. STUVER
as 2:2024cv01206
Defendant:
ALEXIS N. STUVER
Plaintiff:
AMANDA JANKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
STRADER v. HOME DEPOT
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
VANCE STRADER
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
S-S. v. DOE et al
as 2:2024cv01200
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and LYFT, INC.
Plaintiff:
D. S-S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HOFFMAN, ET AL v. SMITH
as 2:2024cv01193
Plaintiff:
David Hoffman and Monica Geidner
Defendant:
Robynne Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
YEARWOOD v. INVISION HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Roberta Yearwood
Defendant:
INVISION HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
ROBINSON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. et al
as 2:2024cv01172
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P. t/d/b/a WAL-MART, WAL-MART SUPERCENTER STORE #2588 and WALMART INC.
Plaintiff:
LACHAR ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BARGER v. NPL CONSTRUCTION CO.
as 2:2024cv01162
Defendant:
NPL CONSTRUCTION CO
Plaintiff:
RONI BARGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
SASSO v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP t/d/b/a WALMART et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Defendant:
WALMART APOLLO, LLC, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP t/d/b/a WALMART and WALMART INC.
Plaintiff:
KAITLYN SASSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
