US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,434
ANGROS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01058
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
THOMAS EDMUND ANGROS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VALE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00197
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRUCE VALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WOODALL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01036
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
John Edward Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PETERSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Clifton Ray Peterson
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JORDAN v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01003
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY and COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
CINDY R JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Social Security (RSI)
HUMPHRIES v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00994
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
KAYLA HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CHALFONT v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Claimant Sarah E Chalfont and Attorney E David Harr
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
BROWN v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Taniesha Nicole Brown
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
GOURLEY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Brian H Gourley
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
COX v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
JOYCE COX
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
