U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,475
WOODALL v. WASHINGTON COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE et al
as 2:2025cv00481
Plaintiff:
JASON M. WOODALL
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, SUPERVISOR RICHARD GLUTH, DETECTIVE KIPRANI YAROSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORD v. BROWN et al
as 2:2025cv00484
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DARNELL FORD, JR.
Defendant:
LORETTA BROWN, DR. WAYNE WALTERS, JEFFERY ABRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
WHITE v. ANDERSON
as 2:2025cv00470
Plaintiff:
Affiant H.E. KRISTIE ANN WHITE
Defendant:
DAVID ERIC ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
