U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,367
BROWN v. ECKENRODE et al
as 3:2025cv00046
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
D. ECKENRODE, T. VAUGHN and Supervisor BLOOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Taylor v. Doe
as 2:2025cv00212
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Taylor
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Kearns et al v. Kearns et al
as 1:2025cv00042
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kearns and Minor Daughters, L.C. and C.C
Defendant:
Brian Kearns, (Police Department) GIRARD BOROUGH, Police Officer EARL COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
KELLY v. BIZUB et al
as 2:2025cv00202
Plaintiff:
COLIN KELLY
Defendant:
OFFICER MYLES BIZUB, MARC HOWARD and LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SCALA v. BEAVER COUNTY et al
as 2:2025cv00193
Plaintiff:
VINCENT SCALA
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, WILLIAM J. SCHOUPPE, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.