District Court Cases in Pennsylvania

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 376,703
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01771
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
HOYE v. SCI CAMP HILL MEDICAL DEPT.
as 2:2019cv01308
Defendant: SCI CAMP HILL MEDICAL DEPT.
Plaintiff: NATHAN HOYE
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Serfass v. Burgess et al
as 3:2019cv01773
Defendant: Thomas F. Burgess, David K. Burgess
Plaintiff: Kenneth S. Serfass, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Watson v. Saul
as 3:2019cv01772
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Kareebah S. Watson
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01775
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Isaac A. Miller
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision
JONES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2019cv01301
Plaintiff: MARVIN WAYNE JONES
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MARGARET A. BROCK
BAILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01305
Defendant: JOHN WETZEL, TAMMY CESARINO, JOHN RIVETTO and others
Plaintiff: MAURICE BAILEY
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bigler Boyz Enviro v. Clean Fuels of Indiana et al
as 4:2019cv01774
Defendant: Wal-Mart, Inc., Clean Fuels of Indiana, Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.
Plaintiff: Bigler Boyz Enviro
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Contract Dispute
CT UTILITY SERVICE, INC. v. DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv00293
Plaintiff: CT UTILITY SERVICE, INC.
Defendant: DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY, DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
DUNLEAVY, IV et al v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv01304
Plaintiff: ERIN E. FRANCIS, WILLIAM L. DUNLEAVY, IV
Defendant: FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?