District Court Cases in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 439,709
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
COSBY v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2025cv00161
Plaintiff:
FIDEL LAMAR COSBY
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDY IRWIN and KIMBERLY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Coyne et al v. City of Scranton et al
as 3:2025cv01091
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coyne and AFG-Media
Defendant:
City of Scranton, Mayor Paige G Cognetti and Jessica Eskra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Dewald v. Hollenbaugh et al
as 1:2025cv01088
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Dewald
Respondent:
Ken Hollenbaugh and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long, Jr. v. Warden of USP-Canaan
as 1:2025cv01092
Petitioner:
Guy Long, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden of USP-Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
