Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 51,656
CARR v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI PINE GROVE et al
as 1:2025cv00046
Petitioner: CHESTER LEE CARR
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT, SCI PINE GROVE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kraynak v. USA
as 4:2025cv00286
Petitioner: Raymond Kraynak
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gaston v. Superintendent of SCI-Rockview et al
as 1:2025cv00282
Petitioner: Richard Gaston
Respondent: Superintendent of SCI-Rockview and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Godwin v. Sage
as 3:2025cv00284
Petitioner: Roger Dale Godwin
Respondent: Jessica Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. United States of America
as 3:2025cv00289
Petitioner: Trabauris Smith
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williamson v. Wilk et al
as 3:2025cv00287
Plaintiff: Jerome Williamson
Defendant: Corporal Nicholas Wilk and Luzerne County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00222
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MARKWITH v. WARDEN OF FCI LORETTO et al
as 3:2025cv00049
Petitioner: JAMES RUSSELL MARKWITH
Respondent: WARDEN OF FCI LORETTO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RAINEY v. GOOD et al
as 3:2025cv00047
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RAINEY
Defendant: C.O.\LT. GOOD and C.O. RAGOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Greene
as 3:2025cv00275
Petitioner: Ronald Allen Wright
Respondent: J. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?