Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 15,102
ROGERS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv00761
Petitioner: JEROME L. ROGERS
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SETH WILLIAMS, GIOVANNI CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
v. PETRUSKY et al
as 2:2017cv00763
Defendant: DANIEL PETRUSKY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WORTHEM v. GIBBS
as 2:2017cv00760
Plaintiff: PRESTON WORTHEM
Defendant: GIBBS
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00762
Petitioner: ALONZO JONES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
J.M.V.R. et al v. KELLY et al
as 5:2017cv00703
Petitioner: J.M.V.R. , ELSA MILAGROS RODRIGUES GARCIA
Respondent: JOHN F. KELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DALES v. MAY et al
as 2:2017cv00743
Plaintiff: DERRICK DALES
Defendant: MAY, BLACK, CORIZON MEDICAL TEAM
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
J.E.L.M. et al v. KELLY et al
as 5:2017cv00704
Petitioner: J.E.L.M. , MARIA DELMI MARTINEZ NOLASCO
Respondent: JOHN F. KELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
OPHER v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2017cv00729
Plaintiff: TERROLD OPHER
Defendant: BLANCHE CARNEY, TERENCE CLARK, JIM KENNEY
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
DICKERSON v. LINK et al
as 2:2017cv00700
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MELEZKHUK v. DONATE et al
as 5:2017cv00690
Petitioner: DOUGLAS MELEZKHUK
Respondent: JANINE M. DONATE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?