US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18,425
SMITH
as 2:2021cv02636
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner:
LAQUAM SMITH
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
HERSH v. CHESTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS et al
as 2:2021cv02615
Defendant:
YOLANDA VAN DE KROL, CHESTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. HERSH, SR.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. SCI-PHOENIX
as 2:2021cv02585
Petitioner:
Bruce Reese
Respondent:
SCI-PHOENIX
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. OBERLANDER et al
as 2:2021cv02600
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, D.F. OBERLANDER
Petitioner:
LATIEF S. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GILLINS v. KEITH et al
as 2:2021cv02591
Petitioner:
SHANI GILLINS
Respondent:
STEVE MILLER, JESSICA KEITH
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAWRENCE v. THE CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2021cv02576
Defendant:
THE CITY OF LANCASTER, THE MANHIEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM K. LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2021cv02561
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KEVEN KAUFFMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
MALIK JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANKS v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv02579
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAMIE SORBER
Petitioner:
ALVIN BANKS
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv02514
Plaintiff:
JEROME WOODS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DELGADO v. RADDAD et al
as 2:2021cv02534
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, BLANCHE CARNEY, C/O RADDAD
and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DELGADO
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
